Ο
νεολιθικός οικισμός
νεολιθικός οικισμός
στον Μακρύγιαλο Πιερίας,
έδωσε την μεγαλύτερη συλλογή
έργων
τέχνης
τέχνης
αυτής της περιόδου,
απ’ όσες έχουν ανακαλυφθεί
μέχρι στιγμής!
Η ανασκαφή του νεολιθικού
οικισμού στον Μακρύγιαλο Πιερίας, στην βόρειο Ελλάδα, αποκάλυψε δύο ξεχωριστές φάσεις
κατοίκησης, κατά την Ύστερη Νεολιθική περίοδο, και έδωσε την μεγαλύτερη συλλογή
έργων τέχνης αυτής της περιόδου, απ’ όσες έχουν ανακαλυφθεί μέχρι στιγμής!
οικισμού στον Μακρύγιαλο Πιερίας, στην βόρειο Ελλάδα, αποκάλυψε δύο ξεχωριστές φάσεις
κατοίκησης, κατά την Ύστερη Νεολιθική περίοδο, και έδωσε την μεγαλύτερη συλλογή
έργων τέχνης αυτής της περιόδου, απ’ όσες έχουν ανακαλυφθεί μέχρι στιγμής!
 |
| Αρχαιολογικό σχεδιάγραμμα του νεολιθικού Μακρύγιαλου. |
Περίληψις της επιστημονικής ανακοινώσεως:
The excavation of the Neolithic settlement at Makriyalos, northern
Greece, revealed the layout of two separate habitation phases of the Late
Neolithic period and provided the largest artefact assemblage of this period
unearthed so far.
Greece, revealed the layout of two separate habitation phases of the Late
Neolithic period and provided the largest artefact assemblage of this period
unearthed so far.
The great variety and the large number of finds allowed a remarkable collaboration
of specialists in an attempt to reconstruct of the economic and social
dimensions of this early society.
of specialists in an attempt to reconstruct of the economic and social
dimensions of this early society.
Excavation data suggest a contrast between communal and individual/domestic
scales of activity during both settlement phases. Consumption practices, as
reconstructed on the basis of the artefacts and ecofacts recovered, may reveal
a similar picture. Analytical methods borrowed from various fields (dental
microwear analysis and isotope analysis of dental and skeletal remains,
chemical analysis of organic residues in pottery and microwear analysis of tool
industries) produce a mass of detailed information that allows a rarely
achieved level of insight into Neolithic subsistence practices.
scales of activity during both settlement phases. Consumption practices, as
reconstructed on the basis of the artefacts and ecofacts recovered, may reveal
a similar picture. Analytical methods borrowed from various fields (dental
microwear analysis and isotope analysis of dental and skeletal remains,
chemical analysis of organic residues in pottery and microwear analysis of tool
industries) produce a mass of detailed information that allows a rarely
achieved level of insight into Neolithic subsistence practices.
Studies of both indirect (archaeobotanical, faunal) and direct (human
skeletal) evidence for subsistence indicate that diet at Makriyalos was not
very different from that at other Neolithic sites. The picture that is emerging
from Makriyalos from the combined analysis of spatial/contextual, artefactual and
ecofactual evidence is that everyday life was structured around a restricted
group, perhaps a family, but that spatial organisation and portable material
culture also placed great emphasis on collective solidarity. Such solidarity
was perhaps reinforced by the sharing of food and labour on a daily basis and
certainly by occasional large gatherings, social events of great importance, at
which the community and perhaps the regional population shared food and drink.
skeletal) evidence for subsistence indicate that diet at Makriyalos was not
very different from that at other Neolithic sites. The picture that is emerging
from Makriyalos from the combined analysis of spatial/contextual, artefactual and
ecofactual evidence is that everyday life was structured around a restricted
group, perhaps a family, but that spatial organisation and portable material
culture also placed great emphasis on collective solidarity. Such solidarity
was perhaps reinforced by the sharing of food and labour on a daily basis and
certainly by occasional large gatherings, social events of great importance, at
which the community and perhaps the regional population shared food and drink.
The provisional nature of the conclusions drawn here must be emphasised,
partly because some aspects of the post-excavation work have not yet been
finished but mainly because the integration of the various specialist studies
is still incomplete.
partly because some aspects of the post-excavation work have not yet been
finished but mainly because the integration of the various specialist studies
is still incomplete.
ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΠΕΡΙΣΣΟΤΕΡΑ: M. PAPPA, P. HALSTEAD, K. KOTSAKIS, A. BOGAARD,
R. FRASER, V. ISAAKIDOU, I. MAINLAND, D. MYLONA, K. SKOURTOPOULOU, S. TRIANTAPHYLLOU,
C. TSORAKI, D. UREM-KOTSOU, S. M. VALAMOTI και R. VEROPOULIDOU «The Neolithic site of Makriyalos, northern Greece – A reconstruction of the socialand economic structure of the settlement through a comparative study of thefinds», στο «PHAROS
SUPPLEMENT 1 – DIET, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY IN THE ANCIENT GREEK WORLD – Towards a
Better Integration of Archaeology and Science», πρακτικά του International
Conference held at the Netherlands Institute, Αθήνα, 22-24.3.2010, επιμ. Sofia Voutsaki και Soultana Maria Valamoti.
R. FRASER, V. ISAAKIDOU, I. MAINLAND, D. MYLONA, K. SKOURTOPOULOU, S. TRIANTAPHYLLOU,
C. TSORAKI, D. UREM-KOTSOU, S. M. VALAMOTI και R. VEROPOULIDOU «The Neolithic site of Makriyalos, northern Greece – A reconstruction of the socialand economic structure of the settlement through a comparative study of thefinds», στο «PHAROS
SUPPLEMENT 1 – DIET, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY IN THE ANCIENT GREEK WORLD – Towards a
Better Integration of Archaeology and Science», πρακτικά του International
Conference held at the Netherlands Institute, Αθήνα, 22-24.3.2010, επιμ. Sofia Voutsaki και Soultana Maria Valamoti.
 |
| Θυμίζω πως στον Μακρύγιαλο έχει βρεθεί γιγάντια χελώνα, που έζησε στον Θερμαϊκό πριν 2.500.000 χρόνια! Ο Θερμαϊκός Κόλπος τότε ήταν γεμάτος γιγάντιες χελώνες! |
ΠΗΓΗ: Γ. Λεκάκης “Σύγχρονης Ελλάδος περιήγησις”.
ΑΡΧΕΙΟΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΟΥ, 23.9.2019.
ΛΕΞΕΙΣ: νεολιθικος οικισμος, Μακρυγιαλος Πιεριας, Νεολιθικη εποχη, εργο τεχνης, Πιερια, ανασκαφη, χελωνα, Θερμαικος κολπος
